coming eventsComing Events

September 6

PBA

September 13

Heritage

September 18-19

Sotheby’s 

September 20

Swann Galleries 

September 21

Skinner 

September 25

Bonhams 

September 27

Forum 

Find More Events in the FB&C Calendar

In the News

Personal Items from the Estate of Stephen Hawking to be Offered Online at Christie’s

London - A brilliant mind whose discoveries have shaped our understanding of the universe,... read more

Exemplars from the History of Printmaking at Swann Galleries on November 1

New York-An auction of Old Master Through Modern Prints on Thursday, November 1 at... read more

Exhibition Charts the Rise and Relevance of the Arts and Crafts Design Movement

Austin, TX — A detailed look at the history of the Arts and Crafts... read more

The Morgan Appoints Maria L. Fredericks as Head of the Thaw Conservation Center

New York —The Morgan Library & Museum announced today the appointment of Maria L.... read more

LOC Puts Papers of President Theodore Roosevelt Online

The largest collection of the papers of President Theodore Roosevelt, documenting his extraordinary career... read more

The 42nd Boston International Antiquarian Book Fair, Nov. 16-18

Boston - The annual fall gathering for booklovers, the Boston International Antiquarian Book Fair... read more

1785 Engraving of Washington & Bob Dylan's Handwritten Lyrics at University Archives Auction

Westport, CT - A rare, 1785 hand-colored portrait engraving of George Washington, printed for... read more

HistoryMiami Museum Features Former National Geographic Photographer Nathan Benn

Miami - HistoryMiami Museum, a Smithsonian Affiliate and a premier Miami cultural institution, presents... read more

Follow us on TwitterLike us on Facebook
Auction Guide
Advertise with Us
2015 Bookseller Resource Guide
Digest

Run, Judge, Run

Would Somebody Please Give the Honorable a Campaign Button?
By F. S. Naiden

Judge Truman signing multiple checks, Missouri, 1929.
To the left, the substitute judge perched on one foot. To the right, the Honorable David Davis.

If you’ve ever appealed a parking ticket, not to mention any costlier legal business, you may have been unamused to learn that most judges are elected officials. Yes, you voted for the gent or lady who fined, garnished, or jailed you. You can even collect his or her election campaign memorabilia, and that of other judges going back to the 18th century. Mountains of posters, broadsides, banners, buttons, sheet music, cartoons, pamphlets, bumper stickers, and palm cards are for sale at printsoldandrare.com and oldpoliticals.com. Pick the party, state, or county you blame the most, and you can compare the throw-away efforts of judicial candidates to secure the votes of those whom they harm or disappoint as often as they help. Or pick a political hero of yours. He likely ran for a judicial office. Andrew Jackson and Harry Truman were elected judges. Abraham Lincoln served as a substitute for a judge, David Davis. Lincoln repaid Davis by nominating him to the US Supreme Court in 1862. The Senate confirmed him by a voice vote. If anyone voted “nay,” there is no record of it.

That’s been the trouble for President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor. Like David Davis, she is not elected, but rather confirmed by the Senate. Yet the Senate is not what it was in the less contentious times of the American Civil War. Today there is a record of each Senator’s vote, preceded by hearings and debates in which most Senators speak. To be sure, there is no election—that would be unconstitutional. Yet Supreme Court nominees have to run for the office just the same. A party leader, the President, picks them. Then they must put themselves in the hands of White House managers who direct the campaign to get them confirmed. And finally, they must elicit statements of support from important voters (that’s where the Senators come in). The statements of the candidate are something any pretzel maker would envy. They start with what the candidate has already said, end with what the Senate wants to hear, and in between are either truthful or deceitful—even the candidate can’t always tell which.

Any political hero of yours likely ran for a judicial office.

How much more natural this candidate was before she became a candidate! When Sotomayor told a Berkeley audience that Latina women could judge more wisely than white men, she was reminding possible supporters that she was available. When she told them that appellate courts make laws, and don’t interpret them, she was reminding them that she was not only available, but ready. Saying this with a smile—Ronald Reagan would have admired her delivery, and so would Bill Clinton.

Supreme Court candidates need campaign buttons. They need campaign songs and tickertape parades down Pennsylvania Avenue. They need TV ads, too, dignified and soft-focus: parade clips, quotes from newspaper editorials, a shot hugging Mom. Then the rest of the voters, the American electorate, will not feel overlooked. The candidate will be free to do what candidates do best, praise the people, and to avoid what all candidates do worst, discuss hypothetical lawsuits in front of C-SPAN cameras. The Senate can follow the opinion polls about the nominee, and vote accordingly. Every senator who wants to defy an opinion poll and vote no can be paired with a senator who wants to defy an opinion poll and vote aye. (Paired voting is nothing new. The Senate already allows paired voting on Supreme Court nominees.)

It would be good for the button business. Remember, judge, times are hard.

The writer is an assistant professor of history at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.

comments powered by Disqus